|
Mr. Dreyer
Algebra 2 Lv 1
Not sure exactly when, but be ready...
For example, if and , our equation is
Reminders:
But what if we just know the slope and some other point, , on the graph, and we don't know the -intercept? Then we can write the equation in the point-slope form:
How do we know that this equation give the proper graph? Since two points determine a line we just have to show that two solutions to the equation are on the graph.
For our first point, let's pick the original point . Is it a solution to the equation (does it make the equation true)? Let's plug it in:
What other point is on the graph? Well, if we add to we should add to (why?)
So that shows that this equation does indeed produce the line with slope passing through the point .
(show graphical example here)
If we know the point-slope form we can convert to slope-intercept to find the -intercept:
So, starting with the slope-intercept form we can determine that the -intercept is
If you have a linear equation (in slope-intercept, point-slope or whatever) and want an equation of a parallel line through the point , just find the slope and use the point-slope form:
How about a line perpendicular to the first one? Remember that if a line has a slope of , perpendiculars have a slope of .
If you just have two points and , you can find the slope
Then you can use any of the above techniques.
In 1960 there were about 320 ppm of CO in the atmosphere. In 2000 there were about 370 ppm. If it keeps growing linearly, in what year will the concentration have doubled (to 640) from 1960 levels?
Then an equation for the line is (using point-slope):
Solving for we get
Back to slope-intercept, there's a special case where the -intercept is 0. In that case we can write the slope-intercept form as
In that case we sometimes rename the slope constant instead of and we call it the constant of variation, and we say that varies directly with . We may write it in two equivalent forms: